High CourtsSingle Bench

T.K.Radhakrishnan vs Managing Director

High Court Of Kerala · Decided on 4 June 2019 · Citation: (2019) 06 KL CK 0006

HON’BLE JUDGES
Anu Sivaraman, J
CASE NUMBER
Writ Petition (Civil) No. 15049 Of 2019

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

10 paragraphs · 192 words
1.

This writ petition is filed seeking directions to the respondent to consider and pass orders on Ext.P1 request made by the petitioner for transfer in

the light of Exts.P2 to P4. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that Ext.P2 is a seniority list of employees in the Kerala Forest Development

Corporation which shows the seniority of the petitioner, who is working as Divisional Manager. It is stated that Ext.P3 transfer norms as well as

Ext.P4 proceedings are to be taken into account while passing orders on Ext.P1 transfer request.

2.

The learned counsel for the respondent would contend that the petitioner had been transferred to the present station due to certain complaints and

Ext.P1 request for transfer submitted by the petitioner will be considered strictly in accordance with Ext.P3 transfer norms.

In the above view of the matter, there will be a direction to the respondent to take up Ext.P1 and pass appropriate orders on the same, taking note of

Exts.P2 to P4 documents as well, within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment.

The writ petition is ordered accordingly.

Â