High CourtsSingle Bench

Torit Bhoosun Bonnerjee vs Taraprosonno Bonnerjee

Calcutta High Court · Decided on 2 April 1879 · Citation: (1879) ILR (Cal) 756

HON’BLE JUDGES
Pontifex, J
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

2 paragraphs · 63 words

Pontifex, J.—[following the opinion of Phear, J., in Cally Churn Mullick v. Janova Dossee (1 I J N.S. 284), to the effect that in such a case as this the widows are entitled to share with their sons], ordered the plaint to be amended by adding the widows as parties.

2.

Attorney for the Plaintiff: Shamaldhone Dutt. Attorney for the Defendants: Mohendronauth Bonnerjee.