AI Structured Summary
Not yet generated for this judgment
No AI summary yet
Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.
Judgment
18 paragraphs · 346 wordsHeard Mr. Tarun Kumar No. 1, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Mahavir Prasad Sinha, learned counsel for respondents-JMADA.
This writ petition has been heard through Video Conferencing in view of the guidelines of the High Court taking into account the situation arising due
to COVID-19 pandemic. None of the parties have complained about any technical snag of audio-video and with their consent this matter has been
heard.
The petitioner has preferred this writ petition for direction upon the respondents for payment of arrear of ACP, arrear of difference amount of sixth
pay revision and other retiral benefits along with interest.
Mr. Tarun Kumar No. 1, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that earlier the petitioner has filed W.P.(S) No. 3725 of 2014 which was disposed
of with direction to the respondent-JMADA to consider the case of the petitioner and to pass reasoned order. Pursuant thereto certain amount has
been paid to the petitioner but the amount as prayed in the writ petition is still due.
Mr. Mahavir Pd. Sinha, learned counsel for respondents-JMADA submits that the retiral dues as prayed in the writ petition is vague in nature and
there is no specific averment with regard to retiral dues.
In view of above facts and considering that atleast prayer for payment of arrear of ACP and arrear of difference amount of sixth pay revision is there
in the writ petition, this writ petition is being disposed of with direction to the petitioner to file fresh representation before respondent no.3 disclosing the
due amount in detail under the various heads within two weeks from today. If such representation is filed within the aforesaid period the respondent
no.3 shall take decision in consultation with respondent no. 2 and pass reasoned order within a period of eight weeks thereafter. It goes without saying
that if the decision is taken in favour of the petitioner, the benefit of the same shall be accrued in favour of the petitioner within a period of further six
weeks thereafter.
With the above observations and directions, this writ petition stands disposed of.
