AI Structured Summary
Not yet generated for this judgment
No AI summary yet
Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.
Judgment
10 paragraphs · 305 wordsB. P. Routray, J
This is an application under Sec.439 Cr.P.C. for bail and the offence alleged is under Sec.20(b)(ii)(C) of the NDPS Act for alleged possession of contraband ganja weighing 60 kg.
Heard Mr. A.S. Paul, learned counsel for the Petitioner as well as Mr. K. Das, learned A.S.C. for the State-Opposite Party.
After hearing Mr. K. Das, learned Additional Standing Counsel for the State-Opposite Party, I am not inclined to release the Petitioner on bail keeping in view the embargo contained in Section 37(1)(b) of the NDPS Act. The prayer for bail is rejected.
However, it is submitted on behalf of the Petitioner that he is inside custody since 24.06.2020 and only four witnesses have been examined till date in course of trial.
Thus considering long period of detention of the Petitioner inside custody and slow progress in trial, it is directed to release the Petitioner on interim bail for a period of three months from the date of his release in connection with Jeypore Sadar P.S. Case No.109/2020 corresponding to T.R. Case No.30/2020 on such terms and conditions to be fixed by learned Sessions Judge-cum-Special Judge, Koraput as he deems just and proper including the condition that the Petitioner shall furnish two sureties (with proper identity proof) out of which one shall be his relative and that, he shall not be involved in any other offence while on bail and shall attend the trial court on each date fixed.
It is made clear that the Petitioner shall surrender in the trial court on or before 16th December, 2022, failing which learned trial court shall take appropriate steps including issuance of NBW of arrest to apprehend him.
The BLAPL is disposed of.
An urgent certified copy of this order be granted on proper application.
………………………….
