High CourtsSingle Bench

Tulu @ Tilu @ Kartika vs State Of Odisha

Orissa High Court · Decided on 9 August 2021 · Citation: (2021) 08 OHC CK 0026

HON’BLE JUDGES
S. K. Sahoo, J
ACTS & SECTIONS REFERRED
Code Of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — Section 439 · Indian Penal Code, 1860 — Section 395
RESULT
Disposed Of
CASE NUMBER
Bail Application No. 908 Of 2021
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

27 paragraphs · 437 words

S.K. Sahoo, J

This matter is taken up through Hybrid arrangement (video conferencing/physical mode).

Learned counsel for the State seeks further adjournment.

The case was filed on 02.02.2021 and it was listed on 01.03.2021 and time was granted to the learned counsel for the State to produce the case diary,

criminal antecedents against the petitioners, if any, so also the test identification parade report. The matter was again listed on 10.05.2021 and was

adjourned. Therefore, I am not inclined to grant further adjournment.

Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel for the State.

This is an application under section 439 of Cr.P.C. in connection with G.R. Case No.292 of 2020 arising out of Odagaon P.S. Case No.192 of 2020

pending in the Court of learned J.M.F.C., Odagaon for offence punishable under section 395 of the Indian Penal Code.

The prayer for bail of the petitioners was rejected by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Nayagarh vide order dated 23.12.2020.

Considering the submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioners that the petitioners are in judicial custody since 20.10.2020, charge sheet

has been submitted under section 395 of the Indian Penal Code and no test identification parade has been conducted in order to establish the

complicity of the petitioners in the alleged crime and two of the co-accused persons have already been released on bail, copies of which have been

annexed to the bail application and after hearing the learned counsel for the State, who pointed out from the rejection order that there are some

criminal antecedents against the petitioners, I am inclined to release the petitioners on bail.

Let the petitioners be released on bail in the aforesaid case on furnishing a bail bond of Rs.50,000/-(rupees fifty thousand) each with two local solvent

sureties each for the like amount to the satisfaction of the learned Court in seisin over the matter with further conditions as the learned Court may

deem just and proper subject to conditions that the petitioners shall appear before the Inspector in-Charge of Odagaon police station once in a month

preferably on Sunday in between

10.00 a.m. to 4.00 p.m. for a period of three months from the date of release and they shall appear before the learned trial Court on each date when

the case would be fixed for trial.

Violation of any terms and conditions shall entail cancellation of bail.

The BLAPL is accordingly disposed of.

Urgent certified copy of this order be granted on proper application.

I.A. NO.548 OF 2021

In view of the order passed today in BLAPL No.908 of 2021, this I.A. is also disposed of.

………………………………..