High CourtsSingle Bench

Uchit Sahani vs State Of Bihar

Patna High Court · Decided on 29 May 2020 · Citation: (2020) 05 PAT CK 0056

HON’BLE JUDGES
Ahsanuddin Amanullah, J
ACTS & SECTIONS REFERRED
Bihar Prohibition And Excise Act, 2016 — Section 30(a) · Indian Penal Code, 1860 — Section 34, 272, 273
RESULT
Disposed Of
CASE NUMBER
Criminal Miscellaneous No. 17498 Of 2020
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

9 paragraphs · 429 words

Ahsanuddin Amanullah, J

1.

The matter has been heard via video conferencing due to lockdown imposed on account of the COVID-19 pandemic.

2.

Heard Mr. Surendra Kumar Mishra, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Jharkhandi Upadhyay, learned Additional Public Prosecutor (hereinafter referred to as the 'APP') for the State.

3.

The petitioner is in custody in connection with Manigachhi (Nehra OP) PS Case No. 35 of 2020 dated 08.02.2020 instituted under Sections 272 and 273/34 of the Indian Penal Code and 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016.

4.

The petitioner has been made accused on the basis of name taken by the arrested co-accused Prem Sahani, who was caught in the mango orchard of one Himanshu Chaudhary, with 420 litres of Nepali liquor and the allegation is that the petitioner was the supplier of such liquor.

5.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that he was not caught at the spot and has been falsely implicated by the co-accused. It was also submitted that there has been no recovery from the petitioner. Learned counsel submitted that though there are two other cases against the petitioner of the year 1998 and 2000, but not under the Excise Act. It was further submitted that the petitioner is in custody since 09.02.2020.

6.

Learned APP submitted that the co-accused, who was arrested, has stated that the petitioner was the supplier of the liquor.

7.

Having considered the facts and circumstances of the case and submissions of learned counsel for the parties, let the petitioner be released on bail upon furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 25,000/- (twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned 2nd Additional Sessions Judge-cum-Special Judge (Excise), Darbhanga in Manigachhi (Nehra OP) PS Case No. 35 of 2020, subject to the conditions (i) that one of the bailors shall be a close relative of the petitioner, (ii) that the petitioner and the bailors shall execute bond with regard to good behaviour of the petitioner, and (iii) that the petitioner shall also give an undertaking to the Court that he shall not indulge in any criminal activity. Any violation of the terms and conditions of the bonds or the undertaking shall lead to cancellation of his bail bonds. The petitioner shall cooperate in the case and be present before the Court on each and every date. Failure to cooperate or being absent on two consecutive dates, without sufficient cause, shall also lead to cancellation of his bail bonds.

8.

The application stands disposed off in the aforementioned terms.