High CourtsSingle Bench

Uday Singh vs State Of Madhya Pradesh

Madhya Pradesh High Court · Decided on 16 October 2020 · Citation: (2020) 10 MP CK 0167

HON’BLE JUDGES
Akhil Kumar Srivastava, J
ACTS & SECTIONS REFERRED
Code Of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — Section 439 · Indian Penal Code, 1860 — Section 344, 363, 366, 376(3), 506 · Protection Of Children From Sexual Offences Act, 2012 — Section 3, 4
RESULT
Dismissed
CASE NUMBER
Miscellaneous Criminal Case No. 11342 Of 2020
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

7 paragraphs · 287 words

Akhil Kumar Srivastava, J

This is the first bail application filed by the applicant under Section 439 of the Cr.P.C. for grant of bail in connection with Crime No. 234/2019 registered at P.S. Gadasarai, District- Dindori (M.P.) for the offence punishable under sections 363, 366, 376(3), 344, 506 of IPC and section 3/4 of POCSO Act, 2012.

According to the case of prosecution, the allegation against the applicant is that he has committed the rape upon the minor prosecutrix below the age of 18 years.

Learned counsel for the applicant submits that applicant is innocent and he is in custody since 2/12/2019. It is further submitted that prosecutrix went with the applicant on her free will and she is the consent party to the sexual intercourse. Charge-sheet has been filed. There is no likelihood of applicant absconding and tampering with the prosecution evidence and his further custody is not required in this case. On the aforesaid grounds, prayer is made to release the applicant on bail.

Learned Panel Lawyer has opposed the submissions made on behalf of the applicant and prayed for rejection of the bail application on the ground that prosecutrix is a minor girl, aged about 15 years and in her court statement she has stated against the present applicant regarding rape upon her.

Having heard the contentions advanced by learned counsel for both the parties and the entire material available in the PDF format as well as the court statement of prosecutrix (PW-1) recorded before the trial court during trial, this Court is of the view that it is not a case wherein applicant may be entitled to be released on bail under section 439 of Cr.P.C.

Therefore, this bail application is hereby dismissed.