High CourtsSingle Bench

Udayveer vs State Of Uttarakhand And Others

Uttarakhand High Court · Decided on 11 November 2024 · Citation: (2024) 11 UK CK 0023

HON’BLE JUDGES
Pankaj Purohit, J
ACTS & SECTIONS REFERRED
Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 — Section 3(5), 109
RESULT
Dismissed
CASE NUMBER
Writ Petition Criminal No. 1233 Of 2024
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

5 paragraphs · 130 words

Pankaj Purohit, J

1.

By means of this writ petition, the petitioner has impugned F.I.R. No.0997 of 2024, under Sections 109 and 3(5) of the B.N.S. Act, 2023 registered with Police Station Laksar, District Haridwar.

2.

It is contended by learned counsel for the petitioner that petitioner is not named in the F.I.R., however, from perusal of the F.I.R., it is clear that the petitioner was Driver of the motorcycle on which Ashu and Kaali was sitting who opened fire on respondent no.3-Manish.

3.

F.I.R. is lodged showing common intention that is defined under Section 3(5) of the B.N.S. Act, 2023. Since the allegations made in the F.I.R. are serious enough, therefore, this Court does not incline to intervene in the matter.

4.

Accordingly, writ petition is dismissed in limine.