High CourtsSingle Bench

Udit Jha @ Sona Babu vs State Of Bihar

Patna High Court · Decided on 2 February 2021 · Citation: (2021) 02 PAT CK 0012

HON’BLE JUDGES
Ahsanuddin Amanullah, J
ACTS & SECTIONS REFERRED
Indian Penal Code, 1860 — Section 356, 379
RESULT
Disposed Of
CASE NUMBER
Criminal Miscellaneous No. 36960 Of 2020
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

20 paragraphs · 379 words
1.

Heard Mr. Bhavesh Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Kumar Ranjit Ranjan, learned Additional Public Prosecutor (hereinafter

referred to as the ‘APP’) for the State.

2.

The petitioner is in custody in connection with Kanti PS Case No. 759 of 2019 dated 10.10.2019, instituted under Sections 356 and 379 of the Indian

Penal Code.

3.

The allegation against the petitioner in connection with an FIR against unknown persons, is that he was party to the snatching of bag containing Rs.

2,40,000/-, motorcycle, cheque book and the documents of the vehicle from the informant.

4.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that he has no past criminal antecedent but on the so-called confessional statement of the petitioner

himself in another case, he has been implicated in many other cases of similar nature including the present case. It was submitted that he is in custody

since 07.02.2020.

5.

Learned APP submitted that the driving licence and bank statement of the informant have been recovered from the petitioner which clearly shows

that he was involved.

6.

Having considered the facts and circumstances of the case and submissions of learned counsel for the parties, let the petitioner be released on bail

upon furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 25,000/- (twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned SDJM,

West, Muzaffarpur in Kanti PS Case No. 759 of 2019 subject to the conditions (i) that one of the bailors shall be a close relative of the petitioner, (ii)

that the petitioner and the bailors shall execute bond with regard to good behaviour of the petitioner, and (iii) that the petitioner shall also give an

undertaking to the Court that he shall not indulge in any illegal/criminal activity, act in violation of any law/statutory provisions, tamper with the

evidence or influence the witnesses. Any violation of the terms and conditions of the bonds or the undertaking shall lead to cancellation of his bail

bonds. The petitioner shall cooperate in the case and be present before the Court on each and every date. Failure to cooperate or being absent on two

consecutive dates, without sufficient cause, shall also lead to cancellation of his bail bonds.

7.

The application stands disposed off in the aforementioned terms.