High CourtsSingle Bench

Unisystems Private Limited vs Stepan Chemical Limited

Punjab And Haryana At Chandigarh · Decided on 20 July 1984 · Citation: (1986) 60 CompCas 753

HON’BLE JUDGES
S.P. Goyal, J
ACTS & SECTIONS REFERRED
Companies Act, 1956 — Section 433, 434, 439
RESULT
Dismissed
CASE NUMBER
Company Petition No. 77 of 1983
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

1 paragraphs · 108 words

S.P. Goyal, J.—The principal amount admittedly has been paid. The learned counsel for the petitioner, however, contends that the petitioner is entitled to get interest on the amount which was wrongly withheld. The learned counsel opposite has controverted this claim and states that there is no stipulation between the parties regarding the payment of interest. The learned counsel for the petitioner does not dispute the fact that there is no agreement for the payment of interest but he claims it on the basis of the bills submitted. This claim thus being hotly disputed, no winding-up order can be passed on its basis. This petition is dismissed. No costs.