High CourtsDivision Bench(2000) 10 GUJ CK 0074

United India Insurance Co. Ltd. vs Hasanbhai Sadiqbhai Ghanchi (Father of Decd.)

Gujarat High Court · Decided on 11 October 2000

HON’BLE JUDGES
K.M. Mehta, J · J.N. Bhatt, J
RESULT
Dismissed
CASE NUMBER
First Appeal No. 2382 of 2000 with Civil Application No. 9479 of 2000

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

9 paragraphs · 412 words

J.N. Bhatt, J.—This is an appeal u/s 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 (`new M.V. Act'' for short) challenging the impugned award made u/s 163A of the new M.V. Act whereby the respondent Nos. 1 and 2 original claimants came to be awarded an amount of Rs. 1,52,000/- for unfortunate and untimely, demise of their young minor son aged about 12 years in a road mishap.

2.

After having taken into consideration the submissions raised before us and the copies of the documents and oral evidence led by the original claimants and relied upon by the Tribunal, we find no justification in this appeal whereas we are satisfied that, in the facts and peculiar circumstances, the impugned judgement and award is fully justified requiring no interference by us in exercise of power u/s 173 of the new M.V. Act.

3.

Before concluding the judgement, we would like to highlight the following aspects which have remained uncontroverted.

1.

The deceased Rahimbhai Hasanbhai Ghanchi was the minor son of the original claimants.

2.

He was pursuing study.

The Tribunal has taken notional income of Rs. 15,000/- relying upon the provisions of Section 163A and Schedule thereunder and adopted multiplier of 15 and deducting 1/3rd amount towards expenditure of the deceased. The Tribunal has, thus, awarded an amount of Rs. 2,25,000/- (Rs. 15,000 x 15) and after deducting 1/3rd, it comes to an amount of Rs. 1,50,000/-. The Tribunal has awarded Rs. 2,000/- under the head funeral expenses. Thus, the Tribunal has awarded total amount of Rs. 1,52,000/- with interest at the rate of 12% from the date of the claim petition. The Tribunal has given direction for disbursement and investment which requires some modification in view of the peculiar facts and special circumstances obtainable in this case. Since the deceased was 12 years old, he would not be able to contribute to the common family fund or to assist for at least 8 years to come. In the circumstances, the direction for disbursement shall be only in respect of 20% whereas 80% of the total amount shall be invested bearing in mind the celebrated principles of law.

The amount of Rs. 25,000/- deposited before the Registry shall be transmitted to the Tribunal concerned by the Registry for passing appropriate order.

With the observations and directions, the appeal shall stand dismissed with no order as to costs.

In view of the order on the main matter, no orders are passed in the Civil Application.