Supreme CourtDivision Bench

University Grants Commission vs Maharishi Mahesh Yogi Vedic Vishwavidyalaya

Supreme Court Of India · Decided on 3 February 2017 · Citation: (2017) 3 Scale 250 : (2017) 3 SCC 114

HON’BLE JUDGES
Kurian Joseph, J · A.M. Khanwilkar, J
ACTS & SECTIONS REFERRED
Constitution of India, 1950 — Article 133
RESULT
Disposed Of
CASE NUMBER
Civil Appeal Nos. 1395-1396 of 2017 (Arising From Special Leave Petition (C) Nos.4003-4004 of 2017), (Arising From Cc No.24575 of 2016)
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

10 paragraphs · 212 words

Kurian, J. - Delay condoned.

2.

Leave granted.

3.

Mr. Mushtaq Ahmad, learned counsel, appears and accepts notice for the sole respondent.

4.

In the nature of order we propose to pass in this matter, it may not be proper for this Court at this stage to express anything on the merits of the case.

5.

However, suffice it to note that the appellant has approached this Court, aggrieved by a direction issued by the Court to comply with the interim order. Compliance would mean that the appellant/University Grants Commission (UGC) will have to change the status of the respondent/University to a State University. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the appellant that as of now it is shown as a private university.

6.

Since the main writ petition is pending consideration before the High Court, having heard the counsel on both the sides, we are of the view that status quo as on today shall be maintained by the parties till the writ petition is disposed of. Ordered accordingly.

7.

The appeals are, accordingly, disposed of.

8.

We make it clear that we have not considered the merits of the matter.

9.

Pending application(s), if any, shall stand disposed of.

10.

There shall be no orders as to costs.