AI Structured Summary
Not yet generated for this judgment
No AI summary yet
Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.
Judgment
10 paragraphs · 375 wordsS.P. Srivastava, J.
Heard the learned Counsel for the appellant.
The appellant feels aggrieved by the award of an amount of Rs. 3,72,600/- as compensation to the claimants on account of the untimely death of Sri Dalvindar Singh, aged about 27 years in the accident involving the offending motor vehicle, a Roadways Bus.
The claimants had come up with the case that on 27.3.2001 at about 6.30 p.m. while Sri Dalvindar Singh was going on his Motor Cycle, the offending Bus, which was being driven rashly and negligently, dashed the Motor Cycle of Sri Daivindar Singh causing his instantaneous death.
The learned Counsel for the insurer-appellant has urged that taking into consideration the age of the deceased, the amount of compensation awarded by the Tribunal is excessive.
In this connection, it may be noticed that Daivindar Singh died in the said accident leaving behind his old parents, his wife and one unmarried daughter. The Tribunal proceeded to assess the income of the deceased as Rs. 2,400/- per month. The extent of dependency was found to be Rs. 1,600/- per month and multiplier of 18 was rightly applied. Thus, the Tribunal rightly awarded a sum of Rs. 3,72,600/- as just compensation and the same cannot be said to be excessive.
The Tribunal after carefully considering the evidence and the materials as brought on record, has come to the conclusion that the injuries, which had resulted in the instantaneous death of the deceased, were caused due to the rash and negligent driving of the offending vehicle.
The learned Counsel for the appellant has tried to assail the findings of the Tribunal returned against it but has not been able to demonstrate that the findings can be taken to be suffering from any such legal infirmity which may justify an interference therein.
Taking into consideration the totality of the circumstances as brought on record, this appeal is totally devoid of merits, which deserves to be and is hereby dismissed in limine.
As prayed, the amount of Rs. 25,000/- deposited in this Court by the insurer-appellant u/s 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act be remitted to the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal concerned so that it may be disbursed to the claimant.
