High CourtsSingle Bench

Usha And Others vs Rajesh Arora And Others

Punjab And Haryana At Chandigarh · Decided on 13 August 2019 · Citation: (2019) 08 P&H CK 0115

HON’BLE JUDGES
Ritu Bahri, J
RESULT
Allowed
CASE NUMBER
First Appeal Order No. 7909 Of 2014
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

85 paragraphs · 819 words

Ritu Bahri, J

This appeal has been filed by the claimant-appellants seeking enhancement of compensation awarded by Motor Accidents Claim Tribunal, Sonepat (hereinafter referred to as 'the Tribunal') vide award dated 20.05.2014 on account of death of Ashok Kumar in a motor vehicular accident which took place on 23.09.2012. Appellant No. 1 is the wife of the deceased, appellants No. 2 to 4 are the children of the deceased whereas appellant No. 5 is the mother of the deceased.

FACTS NOT IN DISPUTE

Brief facts of the case are that Ashok Kumar had died in a road accident which took place on 23.09.2012. He alongwith his brother Rajesh alias Raju was returning from 20th mile stone where they had gone for purchasing of some articles for his shop. Both were on foot as the bicycle got punctured. Rajesh was some five ten paces behind his brother Ashok. When they reached in front of PWD rest house Rai, a car bearing no. DL 1CN-0178, being driven by its driver in a rash and negligent manner and at a high speed came and struck Ashok Kumar from behind due to which he fell down and sustained serious and grievous injuries on his body. Soon after the accident, he was taken to Civil Hospital Sonepat from where he was referred to PGIMS, Rohtak instead of taking him to Rohtak, he was shifted to MAX Super Specialty Hospital Shalimar Bagh Delhi because of the serious injuries sustained by him and finally he died on 12.11.2012. Consequently, the claimant-appellants filed a claim petition before the Tribunal.

COMPENSATION ASSESSED BY THE MACT

A perusal of the award shows that finding on issue no. 1 has been rightly given in favour of the claimants as after registration of FIR No. 290 dated 23.09.2012, respondent No. 1 was challaned (Ex.P6/A) and chargesheeted (Ex.P6/B) keeping in view the judgment passed in Radhey Shayam Versus Girdhari Lal 1993(2) P.L.R., 109.

The claimants have also placed on record MLR of the deceased (Ex.PX&PY). The deceased was 40 years of age at the time of his death keeping in view the MLR and was running grocery shop in his village. However, the Tribunal had assessed his income as Rs.4,500/- per month and assessed compensation as under:-

SR. NO.

HEADS

CALCULATIONS

(i)

Income

Rs.4,500/- p.m.

(ii)

30% of (i) above to be added as future prospects

4,500+1,350=5,850

(iii)

1/4th of (ii) above is deducted as personal

5,850-

expenses of the deceased

1,462=4,388X12=52,656

p.a.

(iv)

Compensation after multiplier of 15 applied

52,656X15=7,89,840/-

(v)

Funeral expenses

Rs.25,000/-

(vi)

Loss of estate

Rs.5,000/-

(vii)

Loss of Consortium

Rs.1,00,000/-

(viii)

Medical bills

Rs.14,55,000/-

(VIII)

TOTAL COMPENSATION AWARDED

RS.23,74,840/-

Hence, the claimants were found entitled to total compensation of Rs.23,74,840/- along with interest @ 7.5% per annum from the date of filing of the petition till realization. Feeling dissatisfied with the impugned award, the claimant-appellants have preferred the present appeal.

REASSESSED COMPENSATION

I have heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the case file.

The fact of accident is admitted and proved. It stands established that the deceased has died as a result of the accident. Finding of negligence has rightly been given by the Tribunal and it does not require any interference on that account.

In the peculiar facts and circumstances of the case, to meet the ends of justice, the compensation is hereby reassessed keeping in view the minimum wages prevalent in State of Haryana in the year 2012 i.e. Rs.6,000/- p.m and in view of the judgments passed by Hon'ble the Supreme Court in Magma General Insurance Company Ltd. V/s. Nanu Ram Alias Chuhru Ram and others, Civil Appeal No. 9581 of 2018 and National Insurance Company Limited Vs. Pranay Sethi and others, Special Leave Petition (Civil) No.25590 of 2014 (decided on 31.10.2017) as under:-

SR. NO.

HEADS

CALCULATIONS

(i)

Income

6,000/- p.m.

(ii)

40% of (i) above to be added as future prospects

6,000+2,400=8,400/-

(iii)

1/4th of (ii) above is deducted as personal

8,400-2,100=

expenses of the deceased

6,300X12=75,600

(iv)

Compensation after multiplier of 15 applied

75,600X15=11,34,000

(v)

Funeral expenses

Rs.15,000/-

(vi)

Loss of estate

Rs.15,000/-

(vii)

Medical bills

Rs.14,55,000/-

(viii)

Loss of Filial Consortium

Rs.2,00,000/- (Rs.40,000/-

each to all the appellants)

(IX)

TOTAL COMPENSATION AWARDED

RS. 28,19,000/-

(X)

ENHANCED AMOUNT OF

RS.28,19,000-23,74,840 =

COMPENSATION

RS.4,44,160/-

The enhanced amount of compensation of Rs.4,44,160/- shall be payable within a period of two months from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order. The enhanced amount of compensation shall carry interest @ 9% per annum from the date of filing of the claim petition, till its realization, in view of the judgment of Hon'ble the Supreme Court in the case of Dara Singh @ Dhara Banjara V/s. Shyam Singh Varma and others, Civil Appeal No. 4528 of 2019. Remaining conditions of disbursal of amount shall remain unaltered.

Accordingly, the award stands modified to the above extent and the present appeal is allowed.