High CourtsSingle Bench

Usha Rani vs State Of Punjab

Punjab And Haryana At Chandigarh · Decided on 8 July 2020 · Citation: (2020) 07 P&H CK 0041

HON’BLE JUDGES
Arvind Singh Sangwan, J
ACTS & SECTIONS REFERRED
Indian Penal Code, 1860 — Section 380, 457 · Code Of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — Section 438(2)
RESULT
Disposed Of
CASE NUMBER
Criminal Miscellaneous Petition (M) No. 12980 Of 2020
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

21 paragraphs · 351 words

Arvind Singh Sangwan, J

The petitioner prays for grant of anticipatory bail in FIR No. 77 dated 21.04.2020, registered under Sections 457 and 380 of the IPC at Police Station

Sadar Patiala, District Patiala.

The operative part of the order dated 27.05.2020, vide which the petitioner has been granted interim bail, is reproduced below:

“Counsel for the petitioner submits that as per the allegations in the FIR, the petitioner, along with other accused has committed theft of

commodities like, Sugar; Ghee; Sarson oil; Haldi; Dal; Surf; Rice etc., Counsel for the petitioner further submits that the petitioner is an old lady aged

about 61 years and on one had the complainant has stated that somebody has committed theft at night in a shop but in the later part of the FIR it is

stated that from his own investigation it came that the petitioner along with three other persons have committed the theft.

Counsel for the petitioner further submits that there is nothing in the FIR as to how the complainant has come to a conclusion that the petitioner has

committed the theft.

Notice of motion.

Mr. Amit Mehta, Senior Deputy Advocate General, Punjab, who is appearing through video conferencing, accepts notice on behalf of the State. He,

however, opposes the prayer on the ground that the allegations against the petitioner are of serious nature.

List again on 8.7.2020.â€​

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner, in pursuance to the order dated 27.05.2020, could not join investigation and seeks one

more opportunity to do the same.

Learned State counsel, on telephonic instructions from the Investigating Officer, submits that the petitioner may be directed to join investigation subject

to conditions envisaged under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C.

In view of the above, the present petition is disposed of and the petitioner is granted concession of anticipatory bail with a direction to appear before

the Investigating Officer and join investigation within a period of 15 days from today or any other date & time as fixed by the Investigating Officer.

However, the petitioner shall abide by the conditions envisaged under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C.