High CourtsSingle Bench

Usha.E.P.Vs Revenue Divisional Officer

High Court Of Kerala · Decided on 7 October 2024 · Citation: (2024) 10 KL CK 0016

HON’BLE JUDGES
Mohammed Nias C.P., J
ACTS & SECTIONS REFERRED
Kerala Conservation of Paddy Land and Wetland Act and Rules, 2008 — Section 2(xva)
RESULT
Disposed Of
CASE NUMBER
Writ Petition (C) No. 29945 Of 2024
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

5 paragraphs · 181 words

Mohammed Nias C.P., J

1.

The petitioner, stated to be the owner of the property having an extent of 5.67 Ares of land comprised in Survey No. 59/4-1 situated in Tirur Taluk, in Kuttippuram Village in Malappuram District, has preferred Ext.P2 application under Form 5 of the Kerala Conservation of Paddy Land and Wetland Act and Rules, 2008, (for short, the Act and the Rules) seeking deletion of the property from the databank.

2.

The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that no orders have been passed on the statutory application so far.

3.

Under such circumstances, there will be a direction to the 2nd respondent Agricultural Officer to provide sufficient inputs required under the Act and the Rules to the 1st respondent Revenue Divisional Officer or the officer authorised under Section 2(XVA) of the Act, within two months from today. On receipt of the same, the 1st respondent Revenue Divisional Officer/authorised officer will consider Ext.P2 application within two months thereafter and pass orders strictly in terms of the Act and the Rules.

The writ petition is disposed of as above.