High CourtsSingle Bench

Uttam Dastidar vs Punjab National Bank And Ors

Delhi High Court · Decided on 16 March 2018 · Citation: (2018) 03 DEL CK 0120

HON’BLE JUDGES
SUNIL GAUR
RESULT
Disposed Of
CASE NUMBER
W.P.(C) 2461 Of 2018

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

11 paragraphs · 213 words

1.Petitioner was compulsorily retired on 30th  November, 2011 (Annexure P-1) and he challenges impugned order of 10th

October, 2012 (Annexure P-2) whereby pension of ` 5,48,164/- was credited into his account.

2.Learned counsel for petitioner submits that petitioner had made several Representations to respondents to seek full pension instead of 2/3rd pension

and the said Representations have not been responded to, thereby compelling petitioner to serve a legal notice of 5th September, 2017 (Annexure P-7)

upon respondents. It is further submitted that there is no response to the said legal notice also.

3.In the facts and circumstances of this case, it is deemed appropriate to dispose of this petition with direction to third respondent to positively respond

to petitioner’s legal notice (Annexure P-7), if not already done, within a period of six weeks from today and in case full pension is not to be

granted to petitioner, then reasons for not granting full pension to petitioner be indicated in the response so given and petitioner be apprised of it within

a week thereafter, so that petitioner may avail of his remedies as available in law, if need be.

4.

With aforesaid directions, this petition and the application are disposed of.

Copy of this order be given Dasti to counsel for the parties.