High CourtsFull Bench

Uzir Ali vs Ram Komal Shaha and Others

Calcutta High Court · Decided on 28 February 1888 · Citation: (1888) ILR (Cal) 383

HON’BLE JUDGES
Wilson, J · Tottenham, J · Pigot, J · O''Kinealy, J · Ghose, J
ACTS & SECTIONS REFERRED
Bengal Tenancy Act, 1885 — Section 174

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

1 paragraphs · 101 words

Wilson, J.—I cannot distinguish this case in principle from the former Full Bench decision of Lal Mohun Mukerjee v. Jogendra Chunder Roy 14 C. 636. Section 174 was there held to be not a matter of mere procedure, but to confer substantive right. In the absence of any indication of intention that the provision is to operate retrospectively, it does not, I think, by the ordinary rules of construction, apply to the proceedings under a decree passed before the commencement of the Act. I should answer the question referred to us in the negative and set aside the order complained of.