High CourtsSingle Bench

V. Shamsundar vs T.N. Balasubramaniam

Madras High Court · Decided on 3 September 2010 · Citation: (2010) 09 MAD CK 0114

HON’BLE JUDGES
M. Jaichandren, J
CASE NUMBER
S.A. No. 150 of 2007

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

15 paragraphs · 263 words

M. Jaichandren, J.—Today, when the matter is listed under the caption ''For reporting settlement'', the learned Counsel appearing on behalf

of the appellant had submitted that there has been a settlement in the matter.

2.

A joint memo signed by the parties, as well as the counsels appearing on their behalf has been filed before this Court. The joint memo filed

before this Court is as follows:

The parties hereto have wholeheartedly decided to settle the above second appeal the following terms:

1) The Respondent herein has agreed to withdraw his claim against the appellant as a cultivating tenant and undertakes not to disturb the

possession of the Appellant over the suit properties, which is the subject matter in O.S. No. 610 of 1994 and O.S. No. 941 of 1994, on the file of

the Subordinate Court, Erode.

2) The suit O.S. No. 610 of 1994, Subordinate Court, Erode, shall stand dismissed and O.S. No. 941 of 1994 shall stand decreed.

3) The Appellant therefore is the absolute owner of the suit properties and the respondent cannot claim any right over the same whatsoever

henceforth.

The above terms of the compromise agreed to between the parties may be recorded and a Decree may be passed on the above terms.

3.

In view of the submissions made by the learned Counsels appearing on behalf of the parties concerned and in view of the joint memo filed

before this Court, the Second Appeal is disposed of in terms of the memo of compromise. The memo of compromise shall form part of the decree.

No costs.