High CourtsDivision Bench(1893) 09 MAD CK 0022

Vaidyanatha Ayyar and Others vs Chinnasami Naik

Madras High Court · Decided on 4 September 1893 · Citation: (1894) ILR (Mad) 108

HON’BLE JUDGES
Muttusami Ayyar, J · Best, J

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

6 paragraphs · 126 words
1.

There can be no doubt that a surviving partner can sue alone for the recovery of a partnership debt, and, in that case, no certificate will be

necessary. On this point we agree with the Bombay High Court in Motilal Bechardoss v. Ghellabhai Hariram ILR 17 Bom. 6

2.

We are also of opinion that the suit is maintainable if brought by the surviving partner conjointly with the heir of the deceased partner. In the

latter case a certificate of heirship will be necessary, unless it appears, on the face of the document sued on, that the debt is a coparcenary debt--

compare Venkataramanna v. Venkayya ILR 14 Mad. 377

3.

The above is, we think, a sufficient answer to the questions referred to us.