High CourtsSingle Bench

Vaishno Devi Siksha Samitti, Mohindergarh vs Chaudhary Ranbir Singh Universit, Jind And Ors

Punjab And Haryana At Chandigarh · Decided on 9 April 2026 · Citation: (2026) 04 P&H CK 1621

HON’BLE JUDGES
Kuldeep Tiwari, J
RESULT
Dismissed
CASE NUMBER
Civil Writ Petition No. 1795 Of 2021
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

8 paragraphs · 168 words

Kuldeep Tiwari, J

1.

This Court vide order dated 14.10.2025, had passed the following order:-

"Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner apprises this Court that during the pendency of the instant writ petition, unfortunately, the demise of the Chairman, who was representing the petitioner/ Management, has occurred. She further submits that she has not received any instructions, from the quarter concerned, to address the arguments.

In view of the above, let Court notice be issued to the petitioner/Management, returnable for 09.04.2026"

2.

As per the office report, court notice issued to the petitioner has been received back with the report that the Chairman has already died. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner also pleads no instructions.

3.

In such circumstances, this Court is left with no other option except to dismiss the instant petition for want of prosecution.

4.

Dismissed for non-prosecution.

5.

However, liberty is reserved to the petitioner, to revive the instant petition by filing an apt motion, in case her grievance still survives.