High CourtsDivision Bench

Vandana Jain vs Antim Kumar Jain

Madhya Pradesh High Court · Decided on 3 July 2019 · Citation: (2019) 07 MP CK 0062

HON’BLE JUDGES
J.K.Maheshwari, J · Anjuli Palo, J
ACTS & SECTIONS REFERRED
Family Courts Act, 1984 — Section 19
RESULT
Dismissed
CASE NUMBER
First Appeal No. 841 Of 2019
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

99 paragraphs · 467 words

This appeal under Section 19 of the Family Courts Act, 1984 has been filed arising out of the judgment dated 23rd March, 2019 passed by the First

Additional Principal Judge, Family Court, Bhopal in Regular Civil Suit HM No. 939/2016 allowing the suit seeking decree of divorce filed by the

respondent-husband.

During pendency of this appeal both the parties have submitted an application to dispose of this appeal in terms of the compromise. The terms of the

compromise are as under:-

“03 - ,

:-

.

(1) 2 , ,

.. 939-/16, 23/03/2019

, 2

1 1 2

2

(2) 2 1 1781/16

,

, , 16/07/2019

2

...

(3) 2 1 125

. 638/16 ,

, ,

, 17/07/2019 2 ,

,

2, 1

(4) 638/16 . .

2

, 2 1

(5) 1 2 / 15, , -2, , ,

. 11/02/2011

1 19 3

2 - 1

2 2

2 , 1

1

.

(6) 1 2 19 3,

2 . - -

2 . 3 , 1, 10,00,000/- ( )

3◌ , 1 000190

10,00,000/- ( ) , 3

. - , .

3 .

3 2 ,

3 2 3

.

(7) 2 3 - . 1

/ 2 3

1 -

(8) . 1 15 -2, , 2

3 -

(9) - -

, - -

, , 3 15,

, -2, , ,

(10) - -

, ,

- ◌

,

, -

- 12/06/2019

-

.

1.

1

.

, - 25, ,

..

, ( )

..

- 15,

..

, , , ( )

2- 2

..

..

, - 200,

.. - 200, , ,

, , ( )

3.

3

.

..

, - -30, - .. 15, , , ,

...

( )

, ,

..

( )

.

4.

, ,

.. ..

-29, , - -47, , ( )

On filing such an application, this Court vide order dated 25.6.2019 directed Registrar (Judicial) of this Court to record the statements of appellant as

well as respondent. Accordingly, their statements have been recorded today by Registrar (J-I) which are made available for perusal of this Court.

During the course of hearing, additional statement/undertaking of the respondent-husband has also been recorded by the Registrar (J-I) under his

signature regarding criminal as well as civil liability of the respondent-husband for non-compliance of the order of this Court, if the cheque of Rs.

10,00,000/- (Rupees ten lakh), which he has handed over to appellant-wife, is dishonoured at the relevant time. The said undertaking has been signed

by the respondent-husband.

Considering the aforesaid and as prayed by the learned counsel for both the parties, this appeal is dismissed as withdrawn with an observation that the

above said terms of compromise would be the part of this order.