AI Structured Summary
Not yet generated for this judgment
No AI summary yet
Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.
Judgment
20 paragraphs · 314 wordsArvind Singh Sangwan, J
The petitioners pray for grant of anticipatory bail in FIR
No.164 dated 30.11.2019 under Sections 498-A, 406 IPC, registered at Police Station : Women Police Station, Chandigarh, U.T., Chandigarh.
The operative part of the order dated 25.06.2020, vide which interim anticipatory bail has been granted to the petitioners, is reproduced as under:-
“....Counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners are the parents-in-law of the complainant and they were granted the concession of
interim bail by the Additional Sessions Judge vide order dated 18.3.2020.
Counsel for the petitioners further submits that, however, on account of COVID-19 situation, they, being aged about 50 years, could not join the
investigation and are ready to join the investigation.
Notice of motion.
Mr. Sukant Gupta, Additional P.P. for U.T., Chandigarh, who is appearing through video conferencing, accepts notice on behalf of the State.
Learned Counsel appearing for the U.T., Chandigarh submits that the husband of the complainant (son of the petitioner) was arrested and during his
remand, some dowry articles were recovered. He has already been granted the concession of regular bail. He further submits that recovery of some
more articles is yet to be effected....â€
Counsel for the petitioners has submitted that, in pursuance to the order dated 25.06.2020, the petitioners have appeared before the Investigating
Officer and have joined the investigation.
Counsel for the State, on instructions from ASI Krishan Kumar, and assisted by counsel for the complainant has not disputed the aforesaid fact and
submits that the petitioners are no more required for further investigation. It is also submitted that both the petitioners, who are parents-in-law have
joined the investigation and some dowry articles have also been recovered.
In view of the above, this petition is allowed and the interim bail granted to the petitioners vide order dated 25.06.2020 is made absolute subject to the
conditions envisaged under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C.
