High Courts(1897) 12 MAD CK 0020

Veerabadhrappa Chetty vs Chinnammah

Madras High Court · Decided on 13 December 1897 · Citation: (1898) ILR (Mad) 403 : (1898) 8 MLJ 189

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

6 paragraphs · 120 words
1.

So far as appears from the record, the District Judge seems to have dismissed the petition u/s 158 of the Code of Civil Procedure, on the

ground that the costs which the counter-petitioner (appellant before us) had been ordered to pay had not been paid. Such costs would ordinarily

be recoverable in execution, and, in the absence of a specific order making their payment a condition precedent to hearing the counter-petitioner''s

evidence, the counter-petitioner''s failure to pay would not render Section 158 applicable.

2.

We must, therefore, set aside the order of the District Judge and direct that the petition be restored to the file and be dealt with according to

law. Costs will abide and follow the result.