High CourtsSingle Bench

Vengappa Shetty vs State Of Kerala

High Court Of Kerala · Decided on 12 April 2023 · Citation: (2023) 04 KL CK 0103

HON’BLE JUDGES
A. Badharudeen, J
ACTS & SECTIONS REFERRED
Kerala Abkari Act, 1967 — Section 58
RESULT
Allowed
CASE NUMBER
Bail Application No. 2708 Of 2023
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

13 paragraphs · 426 words

A. Badharudeen, J

1.

This is an application for regular bail moved by the accused in crime No.37/2023 of Kumbala Excise Range, Kasargod, where the prosecution alleges commission of offences punishable under Section 58 of the Abkari Act.

2.

Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner as well as the learned Public Prosecutor.

3.

I have perused the relevant documents form part of the case diary placed by the learned Public Prosecutor.

4.

The prosecution allegation is that at about 12.10 pm on 21.03.2023, the accused was found in possession of 13.140 litre of Indian Made Foreign Liquor meant 'for sale in state of Karnataka only' for the purpose of sale, against the prohibitions contained in the Kerala Abkari Act. Accordingly, he was nabbed red-handedly and the contraband was taken into custody. Thereafter crime was registered alleging commission of the above offence.

5.

The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner is innocent. He also pointed out that the petitioner has no criminal antecedents. Highlighting the custody of the petitioner from 21.03.2023 onwards and the stature of the petitioner as a first time offender, the learned counsel for the petitioner pressed for grant of regular bail.

6.

Though the learned Public Prosecutor opposed bail highlighting the seriousness of the offence, he also conceded that the petitioner has no criminal antecedents. Since the petitioner has no criminal antecedents, taking note of the progress of investigation and the custody of the petitioner from 21.03.2023, I am inclined to release the petitioner on regular bail.

In the result, this petition stands allowed. The petitioner is enlarged on regular bail on the following conditions:

i. The petitioner shall be released on bail on his executing bond for Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand Only) with two solvent sureties, each for the like amount to the satisfaction of the Jurisdictional court concerned.

ii. The petitioner shall not intimidate the witnesses or tamper with evidence. He shall co-operate with the investigation and shall be available for trial.

iii. The petitioner shall appear before the Investigating Officer as and when directed.

iv. The petitioner shall not, directly or indirectly, make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of this case, so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the court or to any police officer.

v. The petitioner shall not involve in any other offence during the currency of bail and any such event, if informed or came to the notice of this court, the same shall be a reason to cancel the bail hereby granted.