High CourtsDivision Bench(1897) 12 MAD CK 0001

Venkayya Garu vs Venkata Narasimhulu

Madras High Court · Decided on 13 December 1897 · Citation: (1898) ILR (Mad) 401

HON’BLE JUDGES
Subramania Ayyar, J · Benson, J

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

7 paragraphs · 149 words
1.

Assuming that the will in this case is genuine (a question, however, which has not bean tried), the appointment by it of a guardian cannot be held

to be such an appointment as comes within Section 7, Clause 3, of the Guardians and Wards Act, for a Hindu mother has no authority to make

such appointment by will. It was, therefore, the duty of the Court to have enquired u/s 7 as to the necessity for appointing a guardian, and, if

necessary, to have appointed a fit and proper person. In making such appointment he might very properly take into consideration the wishes of the

mother expressed in any genuine will.

2.

We must therefore set aside the order of the District Judge and direct him to restore the petition to his file and to dispose of it according to law.

Costs will abide and follow the result.