High CourtsSingle Bench

Vickky @ Dasendra vs State Of Madhya Pradesh

Madhya Pradesh High Court · Decided on 20 April 2023 · Citation: (2023) 04 MP CK 0082

HON’BLE JUDGES
Rajendra Kumar (Verma), J
ACTS & SECTIONS REFERRED
Code Of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — Section 389(1) · Indian Penal Code, 1860 — Section 465, 468
RESULT
Allowed
CASE NUMBER
Criminal Appeal No. 5457 Of 2023
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

12 paragraphs · 396 words

Rajendra Kumar (Verma), J

Heard on the question of admission.

The appeal is admitted for final hearing.

Also heard on I.A No.8564 of 2023 which is an application under Section 389(1) of Cr.P.C for suspension of sentence moved on behalf of appellant.

The appellant has been convicted for offence under Section 465 of IPC and sentenced to undergo R.I. for 02 years with fine of Rs.2,000/- and under Section 468 of IPC and sentenced to undergo R.I. for 03 years with fine of Rs.3,000/- with default stipulations.

Learned counsel for the appellant submits that the appellant is innocent and has been falsely implicated in the matter. The learned trial Court has erred in not appreciating the fact that there are material omissions and contradictions in the version of the prosecution witnesses. The jail sentence of the appellant has been suspended by the Trial Court till 05.05.2023 and during bail he did not misuse the liberty granted to him. It is further submitted that there is no likelihood of hearing of appeal in near future. Hence, counsel prayed that application for suspension of sentence may be allowed.

Learned Panel Lawyer for the respondent/State on the other hand has opposed the application and prays for its rejection.

In due consideration of the submissions made on behalf of the appellant, o n perusal of the record and looking to the fact that the jail sentence of the appellant is already suspended, it would be appropriate to suspend the jail sentence of the appellant.

Accordingly, I.A No.8564 of 2023 filed on behalf of appellant is allowed and it is directed that subject to deposit of fine amount if already not deposited and on furnishing personal bond by appellant in the sum of Rs.50,000/-(Rupees Fifty Thousand only) with one solvent surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of the learned trial Court, for his regular appearance before the concerned trial Court, the execution of custodial part of the remaining sentence imposed against the appellant shall remain suspended, till the final disposal of this appeal.

The appellant, after being enlarged on bail, shall mark his presence before the concerned trial Court on 11.09.2023 and on all such subsequent dates, which are fixed in this regard by the concerned trial Court. Let the record of the Court below be requisitioned.

List in due course for final hearing.

Certified copy, as per rules.