AI Structured Summary
Not yet generated for this judgment
No AI summary yet
Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.
Judgment
31 paragraphs · 251 wordsThis writ application has been filed by the petitioner
for issuance of a direction to the respondents to pay his due retiral
benefits after counting the service with effect from 29.07.1981 to
the date of retirement on 28.02.2014.
It would be evident from the representation filed
on behalf of the petitioner as contained in Annexure- 3 to the writ
application that earlier, the petitioner was a daily wage employee
and he was taken in regular establishment on a Class-IV post with
effect from 07.12.2004. He retired on attaining the age of
superannuation on 28.02.2014. Thus, the petitioner had served on a
Class-IV post for a period of about nine years and three months
only.
As per the provision under the Bihar Pension
Rules, 1950 (for short ''Pension Rules''), an employee under the
Government service would be entitled for pension if he has
completed the service for more than 10 years.
Rule 58 of the Pension Rules stipulates that the
service of a Government employee does not qualify for pension
unless it conforms to the following three conditions;
First - The service must be under
Government.
Second- The employment must be
substantive and permanent.
Third- The service must be paid by
Government.
Since prior to 07.12.2004, the service of the
petitioner was neither substantive nor permanent, as he was
working on daily wages, the same cannot be counted for making
the service of the petitioner pensionable.
Accordingly, the writ application, being devoid
of merit, is dismissed.
