Tribunals and CommissionsSingle Bench

Vijay vs Commissioner, NDMC & Others

Central Administrative Tribunal · Decided on 9 February 2021 · Citation: (2021) 02 CAT CK 0046

HON’BLE JUDGES
Pradeep Kumar, Member (A)
RESULT
Disposed Of
CASE NUMBER
Original Application 286 Of 2021, Miscellaneous Application No. 360 Of 2021

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

16 paragraphs · 261 words

Prdeep Kumar, Member (A)

1.0. The applicant herein was working as aSafaiKaramchari with NDMC. The applicant has since been superannuated on 30.09.2020. The relevant

order to superannuate him was issued vide memorandum dated 05.05.2020 and he was directed to deposit all connected papers to his concerned

Assistant Inspector. All these documents were accordingly submitted by the applicant vide letter dated 29.10.2020. The applicant is aggrieved that

none of his retiral benefits, not even provisional pension, has been paid to him so far.

2.0 Feeling aggrieved the instant OA has been preferred.

3.0 Issue notice.

4.0 Shri R K Jain, learned counsel, who appears on behalf of respondents, accepts notice.

5.0 At this stage, the applicant submits that he will be satisfied, if some time bound direction is issued to the respondents on his pending representation

dated 29.10.2020 wherein he has already complied with the directions to deposit the required documents.

6.0 In view of the foregoing, the OA is disposed off at the admission stage itself, without going into the merits of the case, with a direction to the

respondents to pass a reasoned and speaking order, in follow up of submission of all the documents etc. by the applicant on 29.10.2020, in keeping

with the extant rules and instructions on the subject, under advice to the applicant, within a time period of six weeks. In case as a result of this

examination, certain payments become due to the applicant, these shall also be released within a time period of four weeks thereafter.

7.0. Pending MA stands disposed off.

No costs.