High CourtsSingle Bench

Vijay Bharti vs State Of Chhattisgarh

Chhattisgarh High Court · Decided on 19 June 2023 · Citation: (2023) 06 CHH CK 0043

HON’BLE JUDGES
Deepak Kumar Tiwari, J
ACTS & SECTIONS REFERRED
Indian Penal Code, 1860 — Section 34, 406, 420 · Code Of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — Section 439 · Prize Chits And Money Circulation Schemes (Banning) Act, 1978 — Section 3, 4, 5 · Chandigarh Nikshepakon Ke Hito Ka Sanraksham Adhiniyam, 2005 — Section 6, 10
RESULT
Allowed
CASE NUMBER
Miscellaneous Criminal Case No. 1310 Of 2023
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

10 paragraphs · 467 words
1.

This application under Section 439 Cr.P.C. for grant of bail has been filed by the accused/applicants who are languishing in jail since 01.10.2021 in connection with Crime No.333/2015 registered at Police Station Kanker, District U.B. Kanker for the offence punishable under Sections 406, 420 & 34 of IPC; Sections 3, 4 & 5 of the Prize Chits And Money Circulation Schemes (Banning) Act; Section 6 & 10 of CG Nikshepakon Ke Hito Ka Sanraksham Adhiniyam, 2005.

2 Prosecution case, in short, is that co-accused Tilak Markam has induced the complainant to invest money in the network marketing company and promised to get double money within 5 years. Thereafter, the complainant invested Rs.24 Lacs in the said Company. However, the accused did not return the money as promised and cheated the complainant. During investigation, it has been found that present applicants are Director of the said Company and they are involved in the aforesaid crime, therefore, they have been arrested.

3.

Learned counsel for the applicants submits that the accused/applicants are innocent and have been roped in a false case. He further submits that there is no direct evidence against the applicants. The applicants are behind the bar since 01.10.2021 and since then one and a half year has been elapsed and final conclusion of the trial is likely to take some more time therefore, the applicants may be released on bail. He also submits that the applicants would abide all terms and conditions imposed on them while granting bail.

4.

Per contra, learned State counsel opposes the bail application. However, learned State counsel submits that as per case diary, applicants have no criminal record.

5.

Having considered the submission of counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of the case, further considering nature of accusation, particularly, considering that applicants are in custody since 01.10.2021 and conclusion of the trial is likely to take some more time, I deem it appropriate to release the applicants on bail.

6.

Accordingly, the application is allowed and it is directed that on each applicant furnishing a personal bond in the sum of Rs.1,00,000/- (One Lac) with two sureties each for the like sum to the satisfaction of the concerned Court, they shall be released on bail on the following conditions:-

(a) they shall not act in any manner which will be prejudicial to fair and expeditious trial,

(b) they shall appear before the trial Court on each and every date given to them im by the said Court till disposal of case,

(c) they shall not involve themselves in any offence of similar nature in future.

(d) they shall furnish details of immovable property held by them and their dependent family members and shall not alienate any immovable property without prior written permission of the trial Court.