High CourtsSingle Bench

Vijay Kumar vs State (NCT Of Delhi) & Anr

Delhi High Court · Decided on 2 August 2018 · Citation: (2018) 08 DEL CK 0034

HON’BLE JUDGES
SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J
ACTS & SECTIONS REFERRED
Indian Electricity Act, 2003 — Section 135
CASE NUMBER
CRL.M.C. 3845 OF 2018
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

21 paragraphs · 351 words

SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J

Crl. M.A. 29105/2018 (Exemption)Â

Allowed, subject to all just exceptions.Â

CRL.M.C. 3845/2018

1.

The petitioner seeks quashing of FIR No. 389 of 2015 under Section 135 of the Indian Electricity Act, 2003, Police Station Sarita Vihar, New Delhi,

based on a settlement.Â

2.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been admitted to Kalra Hospital SRCNC on 30.07.2018 on account of an

emergency complaint. Petitioner has filed his affidavit in support of the petition. Learned counsel prays that petitioner be exempted from personal

appearance. Photocopy of the certificate which is being sent to learned counsel for the petitioner on Whatsapp has been produced. The same is taken

on record. In view thereof, petitioner is granted exemption from personal appearance.

3.

Subject FIR was registered consequent to a raid that had taken place in the premises of the petitioner where direct theft of electricity was alleged

to have been found. A direct theft bill of Rs. 20,094/- was raised. The petitioner approached the respondent for a settlement and the bill was

reduced to Rs.13,000/-. The said amount has been paid and a No Dues Certificate dated 17.05.2018 has been issued. Â

4.

Learned counsel appearing for respondent no. 2/BSES submits that since respondent no. 2 has received the entire settlement amount, respondent

no. 2/BSES-RPL does not wish to press the present complaint against the petitioner any further. Â

5.

In view of the fact that the disputes between the parties have been settled, continuation of criminal proceedings will be an exercise in futility and

justice in the case demands that the dispute between the parties is put to an end and peace is restored; securing the ends of justice being the ultimate

guiding factor. It would also be expedient to quash the subject FIR and the consequent proceedings emanating therefrom.Â

6.

In view of the above, FIR No. 389 of 2015 under Section 135 of the Indian Electricity Act, 2003, Police Station Sarita Vihar, New Delhi and the

consequent proceedings emanating there from are quashed.

7.

Order Dasti under the signatures of the Court Master. Â