AI Structured Summary
Not yet generated for this judgment
No AI summary yet
Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.
Judgment
5 paragraphs · 150 wordsAnoop Chitkara, J
The petitioner, who is a retired Pump Operator, has come up before this Court seeking a direction to the respondents to grant him the benefits on the basis of the judgment rendered by the Court in CWP No. 2735 of 2010, titled Rakesh Kumar versus State of Himachal Pradesh & Others.
Notice. Mrs. Rita Goswami, learned Additional Advocate General, appears and waives service of notice on behalf of the respondents.
In view of the nature of the order, we propose to pass, no response is required from the respondents.
Consequently, this petition is disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to make representation to the first respondent, in accordance with law, mentioning therein his grievances, within two weeks. On receipt of such representation, the concerned respondent shall decide the same, in accordance with law, within two months. Pending application(s), if any, are closed.
