High CourtsSINGLE BENCH(2017) 05 PAT CK 0033

Vijay Kumar Bharti Son Of Shri Krishna Dev Prasad Resident vs The State Of Bihar

Patna High Court · Decided on 10 May 2017

HON’BLE JUDGES
Arvind Srivastava
CASE NUMBER
36815 of 2013

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

21 paragraphs · 216 words
1.

Heard learned counsel for the parties.

2.

Petitioner, by means of this application under section

482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, have invoked the inherent

jurisdiction of this Court with prayer to quash the order dated

30.12.2012, passed by Chief Judicial Magistrate, Nalanda at

Biharsharif, in Laheri P.S. Case No. 138 of 2012, G.R. No. 1950 of

2012, whereby cognizance has been taken against the petitioners for

the offences under sections 18(c), 27(b), (ii), 18(a), 28, 28(a) of the

Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 1940.

3.

The contention of the learned counsel for the petitioner

is that after the prosecution was launched on the complaint of a Drug Inspector but investigation of the case was carried out by the police

which was against the provisions of Section 22(i) of the Act. Learned

counsel has relied upon a Division Bench decision of this Court

dated 21.01.2011 passed in Cr. W.J.C. No. 719 of 1998 and 808 of

1998 on the said point.

4.

In view of express adjudication of this issue, the

application is allowed and the order taking cognizance dated

30.12.2012 passed by the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Nalanda at

Biharsharif in G.R. No. 1950 of 2012 arising out of Laheri P.S. Case

No. 138 of 2012 is, hereby quashed.

5.

The application accordingly stands allowed.