AI Structured Summary
Not yet generated for this judgment
No AI summary yet
Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.
Judgment
10 paragraphs · 239 wordsAlok Kumar Verma, J
This Writ Petition has been filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India with the following prayers:-
“(I) Issue a writ, order or direction, directing the Court of learned 2nd Additional Civil Judge (Jr. Div.), Dehradun to decide and conclude the proceedings of OS No. 96 of 2023, Vijay Kumar Jain Vs. Rajendra Kumar Gupta, very very expeditiously, within the stipulated time, which this Hon'ble court deem fit and proper in facts and circumstances of the case.
(II) Issue any other order or direction which this Hon'ble High Court may deem fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case.
(III) To award cost of the petition to the Petitioner.”
Heard Mr. Rajendra Arya, learned counsel for the petitioner.
Mr. Rajendra Arya, Advocate, appearing for the petitioner-plaintiff submitted that the said Original Suit, filed for partition, is fixed for settlement of issues.
In the facts and circumstances of the case, the learned IInd Additional Civil Judge (Junior Division), Dehradun is directed to make an endeavour to conclude the proceedings of the said Original Suit No. 96 of 2023, “Vijay Kumar Jain Vs. Rajendra Kumar Gupta”, expeditiously, as per law, without granting any unnecessary adjournment to either party.
The Writ Petition (WPMS No.556 of 2026) is disposed of accordingly.
It is made clear that this Court has not expressed any opinion on the merit of the case.
