High CourtsSINGLE BENCH

Vijay Pal Singh vs Union of India and others

Punjab And Haryana At Chandigarh · Decided on 7 September 2017 · Citation: (2017) 09 P&H CK 0058

HON’BLE JUDGES
P.B. Bajanthri
RESULT
Dismissed
CASE NUMBER
11888-2013 (O&M)

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

18 paragraphs · 190 words
1.

Petitioner is a candidate for the post of Junior Translator in

(CSOLS) Examination 2012.

2.

The respondents had prescribed certain qualification in

consultation with the Department of Official Language in respect of

candidates with 55% and above in EQ-I, E.Q.-II will be relaxed. E.Q. II is

reproduced herein.

3.

The respondents had issued corrigendum on 08.09.2017 in

respect of the above issue, thereafter, proceeded with the selection.

Petitioner participated in the process of selection and he has secured 123

marks in Paper-I, 125 marks in Paper-II and 43 marks in the interview. For

want of necessary qualification like diploma or certificate course in the translation from Hindi to English and vice versa or two years of experience

of translation work from Hindi to English and vice versa in the Central or

State Offices including Government of India Undertaking, to that extent

petitioner name was not considered for selection. Therefore, the

respondents have rightly rejected the petitioner''s claim for selection and

appointment to the post of Junior Translator. Thus, the petitioner has not

made out a case so as to interfere with the impugned orders.

4.

Accordingly, petition stands dismissed.