High CourtsSingle Bench

Vijayan C @ Raghavan vs Revenue Divisional Officer

High Court Of Kerala · Decided on 5 August 2021 · Citation: (2021) 08 KL CK 0038

HON’BLE JUDGES
Murali Purushothaman, J
ACTS & SECTIONS REFERRED
Kerala Conservation of Paddy Land and Wet Land Rules, 2008 — Rule 4
RESULT
Disposed Of
CASE NUMBER
Writ Petition (C) No. 15654 Of 2021
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

12 paragraphs · 225 words

Murali Purushothaman, J

1.

The petitioners are the owners and in possession of an extent of 22.91 ares of land comprised in document No.2115/1/2016 of SRO Kunnamkulam

as per Re-Sy.Nos.130/3 and 130/5 [old Sy.No.426] of Chemmanthitta village. The petitioners have filed Ext.P2 application dated 23.07.2021 before

the 1st respondent under Rule 4 of the Kerala Conservation of Paddy Land and Wet Land Rules, 2008 (for short 'The Rules') for removing the

property from the Data Bank. The petitioners have also filed Ext.P3 application in Form No.7 dated 23.07.2021 before the 1st respondent under Rule

12(1) of the Rules for changing the status of the property. The petitioners are aggrieved by the delay in disposal of the applications.

2.

Heard the learned Counsel for the petitioners and the learned Government Pleader.

3.

There will be a direction to the 1st respondent to consider and pass orders on Ext.P2 application, within a period of three months from the date of

receipt of a copy of this judgment and thereafter, if the property is removed from the Data Bank, Ext.P3 application shall be considered by the 1st

respondent, within a period of two months. The petitioners shall produce a copy of the writ petition along with the exhibits and a certified copy of the

judgment before the 1st respondent for compliance.

The writ petition is disposed of accordingly.