AI Structured Summary
Not yet generated for this judgment
No AI summary yet
Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.
Judgment
17 paragraphs · 299 wordsManoj Kumar Tiwari, J
By means of this writ petition, following relief has been sought:
“a) Issue a writ, order, or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding respondent nos. 1 and 2 to take appropriate action for sealing and
demolition of illegal construction raised by respondent no. 3 against the bylaws of M.D.D.A., taking appropriate action on the complaint dated
01.06.2020 (Annexure No. 1 to the writ petition), 08.06.2020 (Annexure No. 2 to the writ petition), 06.07.2020 (Annexure No. 3 to the writ petition)
and 28.07.2020 (Annexure No. 4 to the writ petition), made by the petitioner, forthwith or within stipulated time, which this Hon’ble Court deem fit
and proper in facts and circumstances of the case.â€
It is alleged in the Writ Petition that respondent no. 3 has encroached upon a public road, by constructing a tin-shed, in which he is running a
tailoring shop. It is alleged that a number of complaints were made by the petitioner to the concerned authorities; but, no action has been taken in the
matter up-till now.
Mr. Rahul Consul, learned counsel appearing for Mussoorie-Dehradun Development Authority assures the Court that if any encroachment is made
by respondent no. 3, as alleged by the petitioner, then suitable action shall be taken against him, in accordance with law.
Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, writ petition is disposed of with a direction to Secretary, Mussoorie-Dehradun
Development Authority to look into the complaint made by the petitioner against respondent no. 3. While taking any decision on the complaint,
respondent no. 3 shall also be heard.
This Court hopes and expects that appropriate order, in accordance with law, shall be passed within four weeks from the date of production of
certified copy of this order.
