AI Structured Summary
Not yet generated for this judgment
No AI summary yet
Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.
Judgment
22 paragraphs · 431 wordsThis repeat revision petition has been filed by the applicant under Section 102 of the Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2015 (for
short “the Actâ€) being aggrieved by order dated 29/11/2019 passed by IInd Additional Sessions Judge, Bhind (M.P.) in Criminal Appeal No.
158/2019 whereby the order dated 30/9/19 passed by Principal Magistrate, Juvenile Justice Board, Bhind in Criminal Case No.31/19 dismissing the
application under Section 12 of the Act, has been affirmed. The earlier revision was dismissed on merits vide order dated 11/2/19 passed in Cr.R.
No.257/2019.
After being arrested in connection with Crime No. 581/18 registered at Police Station Dehat Bhind (M.P.), the applicant is confined in Baal
Samprekshan Grah in respect of the offences punishable under Sections 363, 364-A, 302 read with 34 of the IPC and 11/13 of the MPDVPK Act.
Allegation against the applicant in short are that he along with co-accused persons was involved in kidnapping complaint's son namely Veeru, aged
about 13 years, who had gone outside the house but did not return and later on dead body of Veeru was found in an abandoned house. On the
aforesaid basis, crime has been registered.
Learned counsel for the applicant submits that this Court had called for report of the Probationary Officer. The Probationary Officer has informed
that behaviour of the applicant has been good and he is a disciplined boy. He is also paying attention to his studies. In such circumstances, applicant is
required to be re-rehabilitated with his family so that his interests may be properly protected. He deserves to be given an opportunity, therefore,
custody of the applicant may be handed over to his mother Meena W/o Late Shri Jeetpal Singh, R/o Durga Nagar, Lahar Road, Bhind (M.P.).
In response, learned Public Prosecutor opposed the prayer contending that looking to the gravity of offence, if applicant is released, would frustrate
the ends of justice. Hence, the instant revision also deserves to be dismissed.
Taking into consideration the circumstances of the case including that applicant behaviour has been good during his stay in Observation Home and the
entire proceedings are being carried out under the Provisions of Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, it is directed that on furnishing
a personal bond of Rs. 1,00,000/- (Rs. One Lac Only) with one solvent surety in the like amount by mother of the applicant Vikas Singh, custody of
the applicant be handed over to her with a clear stipulation to produce him before the Investigating Officer/trial Court as and when required.
The revision is disposed of.
C.C as per rules.
