High CourtsSingle Bench

Vikas Singh Rana vs State of Uttarakhand

Uttarakhand High Court · Decided on 28 August 2014 · Citation: (2014) 2 NCC 384

HON’BLE JUDGES
Umesh Chandra Dhyani, J
CASE NUMBER
Criminal Misc. Application No. 1225 of 2013 (Under Section 482 Cr.P.C.)

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

4 paragraphs · 374 words

@DELETEUPPERDATA

Umesh Chandra Dhyani, J.—By means of present application under Section 482 Cr.P.C., the applicant seeks to quash the impugned order dated 25.10.2013, passed by learned Additional Sessions Judge, Khatima, in Criminal Case No. 01 of 2013, captioned as Viaks Singh Rana vs. Smt. Mamta Rana & another and the order dated 12.12.2012, passed by learned Judicial Magistrate, Khatima in Criminal Case No. 583 of 2012, Smt. Mamta Rana and others vs. Vikas Singh Rana and others. Proceedings under the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 were initiated against the applicant at the behest of respondent No. 2. An interim order directing the applicant to pay monthly maintenance allowance worth Rs. 5000/- was passed by the courts below. Aggrieved against the same, present Application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. was filed by the applicant, who stated in para 9 of his application that he was always, and is, ready and willing to keep his wife and child with him.

2.

A compounding application being CRMA No. 1269 of 2014 has been filed by the parties, to indicate that they have buried their differences and settled their disputes amicably. The compounding application is supported by affidavits of Vikas Singh Rana (petitioner-husband) and the respondent No. 2 (wife). Both, applicant and the respondent, are present in person, duly identified by their counsels Mr. Lalit Sharma and Mr. V.D. Bisen, respectively. Both of them stated before this Court that the dispute has been settled amicably with the intervention of elderly members of the family and now they have decided to live together. In fact, they are living together as husband and wife.

3.

Compounding Application No. 1269 of 2014 is thus allowed to secure the ends of justice and as a consequence thereof, the impugned order dated 25.10.2013, passed by learned Additional Sessions Judge, Khatima, in Criminal Case No. 01 of 2013, captioned as Viaks Singh Rana vs. Smt. Mamta Rana and another and the order dated 12.12.2012, passed by learned Judicial Magistrate, Khatima in Criminal Case No. 583 of 2012, Smt. Mamta Rana and others vs. Vikas Singh Rana and others, are hereby quashed against the applicant. Application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. is thus disposed of in terms of compromise arrived at between the parties.