High CourtsSingle Bench

Vikash Sharma vs State Of Chhattisgarh

Chhattisgarh High Court · Decided on 3 April 2018 · Citation: (2018) 04 CHH CK 0005

HON’BLE JUDGES
ARVIND SINGH CHANDEL, J
ACTS & SECTIONS REFERRED
Code Of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — Section 439 · Indian Penal Code, 1860 — Section 498A · Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 — Section 12
RESULT
Allowed
CASE NUMBER
M.Cr.C. No.784 of 2018
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

18 paragraphs · 363 words
1.

This is the first bail application filed under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure for grant of regular bail to the Applicant who has been

arrested in connection with Crime No.466 of 2017 registered at Police Station Sarkanda, District Bilaspur for offence punishable under Section 498A

of the Indian Penal Code and Section 12 of the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act.

2.

Case of the prosecution, in brief, is that marriage of Complainant Mamta Sharma was solemnised with the Applicant on 29.4.2016. It is alleged that

after few days of the marriage, harassment and torture of the Complainant was started by the Applicant for demand of dowry. He was making

demand of a car. On the report lodged by the Complainant, a crime has been registered and the Applicant has been arrested on 17.12.2017.

3.

Learned Counsel appearing for the Applicant submits that the Applicant has been falsely implicated in the case. He is innocent. Father of the

Applicant is handicapped. Mother of the Applicant is also suffering from illness. Both of them have already been released on bail by this Court in

M.Cr.C. No.561 of 2017 vide order dated 24.8.2017. The Applicant is in custody since 17.12.2017. Trial will take a long time. Therefore, he may be

released on bail.

4.

Learned Counsel appearing for the State opposes the bail application.

5.

I have heard Learned Counsel appearing for the parties and perused the entire case diary with due care.

6.

Taking into consideration the facts and circumstances of the case, particularly, the facts that the parents of the Applicant have already been

released on bail by this Court, the Applicant is in jail since 17.12.2017 and trial is likely to take some time, without further commenting on merits of the

case, I am inclined to enlarge the Applicant on bail.

7.

Accordingly, the bail application is allowed.

8.

It is directed that the Applicant shall be released on bail on furnishing a personal bond in the sum of Rs.10,000/- with one solvent surety of the like

sum to the satisfaction of the concerned Trial Court for his appearance before the said Court as and when directed.