AI Structured Summary
Not yet generated for this judgment
No AI summary yet
Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.
Judgment
9 paragraphs · 204 wordsRavindra Maithani, J
Applicant Vikku Kumar is in judicial custody in Case Crime No.568 of 2023, under Sections 8/20 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (the Act), Police Station- Ranipur, District- Haridwar. He has sought his release on bail.
Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record.
According to the FIR, on 12.12.2023, 6 Kg Ganja was allegedly recovered from the possession of the applicant. Ganja was also recovered from the possession of other co-accused.
It is the case of the applicant that he has been falsely implicated; there has been non-compliance of the provisions of the Act; the alleged recovered quantity is less than commercial; he is not a previous convict.
Learned State Counsel would submit that the bail rejection order does not reveal any previous conviction of the applicant.
Having considered, this Court is of the view that it is a case fit for bail and the applicant deserves to be enlarged on bail.
The bail application is allowed.
Let the applicant be released on bail, on his executing a personal bond and furnishing two reliable sureties, each of the like amount, to the satisfaction of the court concerned.