High CourtsSingle Bench

Vikram Singh @ Doliya vs State Of Karnataka

Karnataka High Court · Decided on 13 April 2020 · Citation: (2020) 04 KAR CK 0014

HON’BLE JUDGES
K. N. Phaneendra, J
ACTS & SECTIONS REFERRED
Indian Penal Code, 1860 — Section 120(B), 398, 511 · Indian Arms Act, 1959 — Section 3, 25
RESULT
Allowed
CASE NUMBER
Criminal Petition No. 2168 Of 2020
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

25 paragraphs · 412 words

K. N. Phaneendra, J

1.

Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned High Court Government Pleader for the respondent State. Perused the records.

2.

The petitioner/accused is chargesheeted for the offence punishable under Sections 398, 511, 120(B) of IPC and Sections 3 and 25 of the Indian

Arms Act.

3.

The brief facts of the case are that, a person by name Sri. Arun Sanjay Sindhe (Datta) resident of No.9, 1st Floor, Gokula Complex, Kempanna

Lane, Nagarthpet Cross, Bengaluru, has lodged a complaint before the respondent-Police Station making allegations that, the petitioner/accused along

with others dodged into the jewelry shop of the complainant and threatened him with dire consequences and snatched his mobile phone etc.

Immediately, the complainant informed the police about the said incident. In fact, on the basis of the said complaint lodged by the complainant, the

respondent- police have arrested the petitioner on 26.10.2013 and since then, he has been in judicial custody. The offence punishable under Section

398 is punishable with the maximum punishment of imprisonment for seven years and Section 120(B) is also punishable with two years imprisonment.

It is seen that the petitioner/accused has been in judicial custody for more than 6½ years.

Therefore, taking into consideration the long incarceration of the petitioner/accused and there is no chances of early disposal of the case in SC

No.38/2014 by the trial Court viz., LXIII Additional City Civil and Sessions Judge (CCH-64), Bengaluru, in my opinion, the petitioner is entitled to be

enlarged on bail on some conditions. Hence, the following, -

ORDER

The Petition is allowed. Consequently, the petitioner/Accused-Vikram Singh @ Doliya shall be released on bail in SC No.38/2014 (Crime No.

339/2013 of the respondent-Halasoor Gate Police Station, Bengaluru), now pending before the Court of LXIII Additional City Civil and Sessions Judge

at Bengaluru (CCH-64) for the aforesaid offences, subject to the following conditions:

(i) The petitioner shall execute his personal bond for a sum of Rs.2,00,000/- (Rupees Two Lakhs only) with Two Sureties for the like-sum to the

satisfaction of the jurisdictional Court.

(ii) The petitioner shall not tamper the prosecution witnesses.

(iii) The petitioner shall appear before the jurisdictional Court as and when called for and also on all future hearing dates unless exempted by the Court

for any genuine cause.

(iv) The petitioner shall not leave the jurisdiction of the trial Court ie., Bengaluru Urban or Rural District, without prior permission, till the case

registered against him is disposed of.