High CourtsSingle Bench

Vikram Singh @ Upi vs State

Rajasthan High Court · Decided on 18 February 2020 · Citation: (2020) 02 RAJ CK 0299

HON’BLE JUDGES
Sandeep Mehta, J
ACTS & SECTIONS REFERRED
Indian Penal Code, 1860 — Section 354, 452 · Protection Of Children from Sexual Offences (POCSO) Act, 2012 — Section 7, 8 · Code Of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — Section 389
RESULT
Allowed
CASE NUMBER
Criminal Miscellaneous Suspension Of Sentences Application (Appeal) No. 300 Of 2020 In Criminal Appeal No. 241 Of 2020
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

24 paragraphs · 443 words

Heard learned counsel for the applicant-appellant and learned Public Prosecutor on the application for suspension of sentences.

Learned counsel for the appellant submits that the sentences awarded to the applicant-appellant have already been suspended by the trial court for a

period of thirty days.

The applicant-appellant herein has been convicted for offences under Sections 354 & 452 IPC and Section 7/8 of the POCSO Act vide judgment

dated 04.02.2020 passed by learned Special Judge, POCSO Act Cases, Jodhpur Metro, Jodhpur in Sessions Case No.152/2018 and has been

sentenced to maximum punishment of three years.

Upon a consideration of the arguments advanced on behalf of the appellant and having regard to the facts and circumstances as available on the

record, this Court is of the opinion that it is a fit case for suspending the sentences awarded to the accused appellant during pendency of the instant

appeal.

Accordingly, the application for suspension of sentence filed under Section 389 Cr.P.C. is allowed and it is ordered that the sentences passed by the

learned Special Judge, POCSO Act Cases, Jodhpur Methor, Jodhpur vide judgment dated 04.02.2020 in Sessions Case No.152/2018 against the

appellant-applicant Vikram Singh @ Upi S/o Shri Bhawani Singh shall remain suspended till final disposal of the aforesaid appeal and he shall be

released on bail, provided he executes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the

learned trial Judge for his appearance in this court on 17.03.2020 and whenever ordered to do so till the disposal of the appeal on the conditions

indicated below:-

1.

That he/she/they will appear before the trial Court in the month of January of every year till the appeal is decided.

2.

That if the applicant(s) changes the place of residence, he/she/they will give in writing his/her/their changed address to the trial Court as well as to

the counsel in the High Court.

3.

Similarly, if the sureties change their address(s), they will give in writing their changed address to the trial Court.

The learned trial Court shall keep the record of attendance of the accused-applicant(s) in a separate file. Such file be registered as Criminal Misc.

Case related to original case in which the accused-applicant(s) was/were tried and convicted. A copy of this order shall also be placed in that file for

ready reference. Criminal Misc. file shall not be taken into account for statistical purpose relating to pendency and disposal of cases in the trial court.

In case the said accused applicant(s) does not appear before the trial court, the learned trial Judge shall report the matter to the High Court for

cancellation of bail.