AI Structured Summary
Not yet generated for this judgment
No AI summary yet
Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.
Judgment
5 paragraphs · 179 wordsWe have heard counsel for the parties.
In T.P. (Crl.) No. 256 of 2004, the Petitioner prays for transfer of a criminal case u/s 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act pending before the Court in Chennai to Delhi. In T.P. (Crl.) No. 258 of 2004, a similar prayer is made for transfer of the case from Ghaziabad to Delhi.
The case of the Petitioners appears to be that in re�spect of the same transaction several cheques had been issued, but they were presented for encashment at different places, resulting in prosecutions at different places.
In the facts and circumstances of the case, we partly allow T.P. (Crl.) No. 256 of 2004 and transfer the Complaint Case No. 1408 of 2004 pending before the Court of Metropolitan Magistrate XIV Egmore Madras entitled Escorts Limited v. Vikram Tractors to the Court of Additional Civil Judge, Ghaziabad where another matter being Complaint Case No. 63 of 2004 which is the subject-matter of T.P. (Crl.) No. 258 is pending.
The T.P. (Crl.) No. 258 of 2004 is dismissed.
