High CourtsDivision Bench(2020) 06 DEL CK 0176

Vikrant Tongad vs Union Of India (MOEFCC)

Delhi High Court · Decided on 30 June 2020

HON’BLE JUDGES
Dhirubhai Naranbhai Patel, CJ · Prateek Jalan, J
RESULT
Allowed
CASE NUMBER
Civil Writ Petition No. 3747 Of 2020, Civil Miscellaneous Application No. 13426 Of 2020

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

83 paragraphs · 1,559 words

D. N. Patel, CJ

Proceedings of the matter have been conducted through video conferencing.

1.

This petition has been preferred with the following prayers:

“a. Issue a Writ in the nature of Mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order or direction to the Respondent to extend the notice

period to the public, in the draft EIA notification 2020 until 30 September, 2020 or till such further period till the Covid-19 lockdown/

restrictions subsist;

b. Issue a Writ in the nature of Mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order, or direction to the Respondent to make translated copies of

the draft notification available across the country in the official vernacular languages mentioned in the Eighth Schedule to the Constitution,

and upload the same on all its websites including those of the Environment Ministries of all the States as well as those of the State Pollution

Control Boards;

c. Issue a Writ in the nature of Mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order or direction to the Respondent to conduct consultations with

various stakeholders and concerned persons across the country through its State Pollution Control Boards, as a precondition to

considering the draft notification; d. Pass any other directions or orders as deemed fit by this Hon’ble Court.â€​

2.

The Central Government, in exercise of the power conferred by Section 3(1) and Section 3(2)(v) of the Environment (Protection) Act, 1986, issued

a draft notification dated 23rd March, 2020 for imposing certain restrictions and prohibition on the undertaking some projects or expansion or

modernisation of such existing projects entailing capacity addition, in any part of India. This draft notification was issued for the information of the

public likely to be affected thereby, and inviting any objections or suggestions on the proposal contained in the draft notification in writing for

consideration of the Central Government, and notice was given that the said draft notification shall be taken into consideration on or after the expiry of

a period of sixty days from the date on which the copies of the gazette containing notification are made available to the public. This draft notification

was published on 11th April, 2020 in the Gazette of India.

3.

For ready reference Section 3(1) and Section 3(2)(v) of the Environment (Protection) Act, 1986 read as under:

“3. POWER OF CENTRAL GOVERNMENT TO TAKE MEASURES TO PROTECT AND IMPROVE ENVIRONMENT.- (1) Subject to the

provisions of this Act, the Central Government, shall have the power to take all such measures as it deems necessary or expedient for the purpose of

protecting and improving the quality of the environment and preventing controlling and abating environmental pollution.

xx xx xx

(2)(v) restriction of areas in which any industries, operations or processes or class of industries, operations or processes shall not be carried out or

shall be carried out subject to certain safeguards;â€​

4.

The original notification was published on 11th April, 2020 under Rule 5(3)(c) of Environment (Protection) Rules, 1986 to be read with Section 3 of

Environment Protection Act, 1986. For ready reference Rule 5(3)(a) and Rule 5(3)(c) of the of Environment (Protection) Rules, 1986 read as under:

“5. Prohibitions and restrictions on the location of industries and the carrying on processes and operations in different areas

.....

(3) (a) Whenever it appears to the Central Government that it is expedient to impose prohibition or restrictions on the locations Of an

industry or the carrying on of processes and operations in an area, it may by notification in the Official Gazette and in such other manner

as the Central government may deem necessary from time to time, give notice of its intention to do so.

xx xx xx

(c) Any person interested in filing an objection against the imposition of prohibition or restrictions on carrying on of processes or

operations as notified under clause (a) may do so in writing to the Central Government within sixty days from the date of publication of the

notification in the Official Gazette.â€​

(emphasis supplied)

5.

The time to file objections was granted for sixty days. Since this time limit was to be over on 11th June, 2020, another notification was published on

8th May, 2020 (at Annexure P-6 of the paper book) extending further the notice period by sixty days. For ready reference the relevant portion of the

notification dated 8th May, 2020 reads as under:

“AND WHEREAS, the Ministry of Environment, Forest and Climate Change is in receipt of several representations for extension of notice

period expressing concern that the draft EIA Notification 2020 was published during the lockdown imposed due to the Corona Virus

(COVID-19) pandemic;

AND WHEREAS, the Ministry of Environment, Forest and Climate Change after due consideration, deems it fit to extend the notice period

for a further period;

Now, therefore, the Central Government in exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (1), and clause (v) of sub-section (2) of section

3 of the Environment (Protection) Act, 1986 (29 of 1986) hereby extends the notice period for a further period of sixty days. The draft

notification issued vide S.O. 1199(E), dated the 23rd March, 2020 and published on 11th April, 2020 in the official gazette shall be taken

into consideration for finalization on or after the 30th June, 2020;â€​

(emphasis supplied)

6.

In view of the aforesaid notification dated 8th May, 2020 Annexure P-6, it appears that because of prevailing situation of lockdown due to Covid-19

pandemic the time limit has been extended for a further period of sixty days, whereas, the last date/cut-off date mentioned therein is 30th June,

2020.This is an error apparent on the face of the record.

7.

Thus, looking to the earlier notification which was published on 11th April, 2020 (Annexure P-5 to the memo of this writ petition), the time limit to

file objection was upto 11th June, 2020 and the subsequent notification dated 8th May, 2020 (Annexure P-6 to the memo of this writ petition)

extending the notice period for a further period of sixty days, it appears that the notice period will be over on 11th August, 2020 whereas in the

notification dated 8th May, 2020 it has been mentioned as 30th June, 2020. We, therefore, clarify that the time limit to file the objections to the draft

notification is up to 11th August, 2020.

8.

It was contended on behalf of the respondents that the time limit for submitting objections was in fact extended only upto 30th June, 2020 as

provided in the notification dated 8th May, 2020. However, it is evident from a reading of the said notification that the extension for a “further

period of sixty days†also finds mention therein. There is thus, at the very least, a facial ambiguity in the notification, which in our view must be

resolved in favour of the public whose comments are invited thereby. This would also aid the process of effective public consultation, which is built

into the statutory scheme, and for which purpose the extension notification dated 8th May, 2020 was issued.

9.

The second issue canvassed by learned Senior Counsel for the petitioner was regarding the languages in which the draft notification dated 23rd

March, 2020 (published in the Gazette of India on 11th April, 2020) has been made available to the public. It was contended that the draft has been

published only in English and Hindi, whereas it is proposed to have effect all over India and to several industries and comments have naturally been

elicited from all over the country. The affidavit dated 30th June, 2020 filed by the respondents states in this connection that the notifications are

published in the Gazette only in Hindi and English, but comments and responses can be made in multiple languages, and have in fact been made in

other languages as well, which will also be considered. Learned Senior Counsel for the petitioner has pointed out that the respondent has, in the past,

published its draft notification in several other languages also. He has drawn our attention to a notification dated 15th September, 2010 issued in

connection with the Coastal Regulation Zone in this regard. The said notification dated 15th September, 2010 states that the draft notification was

published in nine coastal languages in addition to English and Hindi.

10.

Having regard to the Notification which prohibits (i) modernization, (ii) expansion and (iii) establishment of several industries as stated in the

Notification and also looking to the far reaching consequences of the public consultation process for which the draft notification has been published,

we are of the view that it would be in aid of effective dissemination of the proposed notification if arrangements are made for its translation into other

languages as well, at least those mentioned in the Eighth Schedule to the Constitution. Such translation may be undertaken by the Government of India

itself, or with the assistance of the respective State Governments, where applicable. Such translations should also be published through the website of

the Ministry of Environment, Forest and Climate Change, Government of India as well as on websites of Environment Ministries of all the States as

well as those of State Pollution Control Boards, within ten days from today. This would further enable the public to respond to the draft within the

period stipulated in this judgment.

11.

The writ petition is allowed to the aforesaid extent and disposed of in terms of the directions contained hereinabove.