AI Structured Summary
Not yet generated for this judgment
No AI summary yet
Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.
Judgment
26 paragraphs · 391 wordsSanjeev Sachdeva, J
CM APPL.27898/2020 (exemption) in CM(M) 544/2020 CM APPL.27966/2020 (exemption) in CM(M) 547/2020
Exemptions are allowed subject to all just exceptions.
CM(M) 544/2020 & CM APPL.27897/2020 (stay) & CM(M) 547/2020 & CM APPL.27965/2020 (stay)
The hearing was conducted through video conferencing.
Petitioner in CM(M) 544/2020 is aggrieved by order dated 08.10.2020, whereby, application of the petitioner to place on record certain documents
was partly disallowed. Petitioner in CM(M) 547/2020 impugns order dated 27.10.2020, whereby, application of the petitioner under Order 6 Rule 17
CPC was adjourned and it was directed that the arguments on the application under Order 39 Rules 1 and 2 CPC filed by the respondent shall be
heard first.
Learned counsel for the petitioner contends that the Trial Court should not have adjourned the amendment application and proceed further with the
arguments on the stay application filed by the respondent.
Learned senior counsel for the respondent submits that applications have been filed by the petitioner to delay the proceedings and the amendment
sought would not affect the case of the respondent/plaintiff.
After some arguments, learned counsel for the parties for the purposes of expeditious disposal of the Suit have agreed that the petitions be disposed
of in the following terms:-
(i) The impugned order dated 08.10.2020 is set aside to the extent that it rejects the application of the petitioner Order 11 Rule 1 (10) CPC
partly and disallows the taking on record of some documents.
(ii) Application under Order 11 Rule 1 (10) CPC is allowed and all the documents sought to be placed on record by the petitioner are taken
on record of the Trial Court.
(iii) Application under Order 6 Rule 17 CPC, seeking amendment of the Written Statement is allowed. The amended written statement
annexed to the application is taken on record of the Trial Court.
(iv) Respondent/plaintiff shall file replication to the written statement within two weeks from today.
(v) The Trial Court shall proceed further with the arguments on the application under Order 39 Rules 1 and 2 filed by the respondent and
endeavour to dispose of the same within a period of one month from today.
Petitions are allowed in the above terms.
Copy of the judgment be uploaded on the High Court website and be also forwarded to counsels through email.
