High CourtsSingle Bench

Vineet Tiwari vs State Of Madhya Pradesh

Madhya Pradesh High Court · Decided on 3 January 2024 · Citation: (2024) 01 MP CK 0034

HON’BLE JUDGES
Dinesh Kumar Paliwal, J
ACTS & SECTIONS REFERRED
Code Of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — Section 389(1) · Indian Penal Code, 1860 — Section 120B, 193, 205, 419
CASE NUMBER
Criminal Appeal No. 16231 Of 2023
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

9 paragraphs · 440 words

Dinesh Kumar Paliwal, J

Heard on I.A. No.30771/2023, an application under Section 389(1) of Cr.P.C. for suspension of sentence and grant of bail to appellant, pending the appeal.

Appellant has been convicted for commission of offence under Section 419 of IPC and has been sentenced to undergo R.I. for 02 years and fine of Rs.1000/-; under Sections 205, 120B and 193 of IPC and has been sentenced to undergo R.I. for 03 years for each offence and fine of Rs.1000/- for each offence with default stipulation vide judgment dated 11.12.2023 delivered by 9th Additional Sessions Judge, District Jabalpur, in S.T. No.99/2015 (State of M.P. Vs. Vineet Tiwari and another).

Learned counsel for the appellant has submitted that appellant has not committed any offence. He has been erroneously convicted by the trial Court. Learned counsel for the appellant has submitted that in the course of trial appellant was on bail. He has not misused the liberty granted by way of bail during trial. The appellant has fair chance to succeed in the appeal. It is further submitted that a short sentence has been awarded by the trial Court and there is no possibility of hearing of this appeal in near future. It is further submitted that after conviction and passing of order of jail sentence, learned trial Court itself has suspended the jail sentence of the appellant till 10.1.2024. Therefore, if the execution of jail sentence of appellant is not suspended, the purpose of filing this appeal would become futile. Therefore, it has been prayed that the execution of jail sentence of appellant be suspended and he be released on bail.

On the other hand, learned counsel for the respondent/State has opposed the grant of bail to the appellant.

Having considered the short nature of sentence and the fact that there is no possibility of hearing of this appeal in near future, I am inclined to suspend the remaining jail sentence of the appellant.

Consequently, I.A. No.30771/2023 is allowed. The execution of jail sentence of appellant- Vineet Tiwari is hereby suspended subject to depositing the fine amount, (if not already deposited). It is directed that the appellant be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond to a sum of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees fifty thousand only) with one solvent surety of the like amount to the satisfaction of the trial court with a further direction to appear before the trial Court on 22.4.2024 and also on such other dates, as may be fixed by that Court in this regard during the pendency of this appeal.

List this case for arguments on admission after receipt of record.

Certified copy as per rules.