High CourtsSingle Bench

Vinish Kumar Saini vs State Of Uttarakhand

Uttarakhand High Court · Decided on 6 March 2025 · Citation: (2025) 03 UK CK 0813

HON’BLE JUDGES
Alok Kumar Verma, J
ACTS & SECTIONS REFERRED
Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 — Section 35(3), 482 · Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 — Section 318(4), 351(2), 352
RESULT
Disposed Of
CASE NUMBER
Anticipatory Bail Application No. 244 Of 2025
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

5 paragraphs · 167 words

Alok Kumar Verma, J

1.

The present Application under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 has been filed by the applicant seeking anticipatory bail under Sections 318(4), 351(2) and Section 352 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 in Case Crime No.8 of 2025, registered at Police Station Srinagar, District Pauri Garhwal.

2.

Heard Mr. Bilal Ahmed, learned counsel for applicant and Mr. G.S. Sandhu, learned Additional Advocate General assisted by Mr. Deepak Bhardwaj, learned Brief Holder for the State.

3.

Mr. G.S. Sandhu, learned Additional Advocate General for the State, on instruction received from the Investigating Officer, submitted that a notice under Section 35(3) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 has been sent to the applicant by the Investigating Officer. The Investigating Officer is not going to arrest the applicant at this stage.

4.

After the said submission, on the request of Mr. Bilal Ahmed, learned counsel for the applicant, the present Anticipatory Bail Application (ABA No.244 of 2025) is disposed of accordingly.