High CourtsSingle Bench

Vinod Kumar vs State of Union Territory of Chandigarh

Punjab And Haryana At Chandigarh · Decided on 10 October 2018 · Citation: (2018) 10 P&H CK 0111

HON’BLE JUDGES
P.B. Bajanthri, J
ACTS & SECTIONS REFERRED
Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — Section 438, 438(2) · Indian Penal Code, 1860 — Section 120B, 417, 419, 420
RESULT
Allowed
CASE NUMBER
Criminal Miscellaneous (M) No.34547 of 2018 (O&M)
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

12 paragraphs · 201 words
1.

In the instant, petition, petitioner is seeking anticipatory bail under the provisions of Section 438 Cr.P.C. in FIR No.365 dated 19.09.2016 under

Sections 417/419/420/120-B IPC, registered at Police Station Sector 17, Chandigarh.

2.) This Court vide order dated 13.08.2018 had directed the petitioner to join investigation and in the event of arrest by the Investigating Officer,

petitioner was ordered to be released on interim bail on his furnishing bail bonds to the satisfaction of the Investigating Officer.

3.) Learned State counsel, on instructions from Sub Inspector Prem Singh, submitted that in pursuance to the order dated 13.08.2018, petitioner

appeared before the Investigating Officer and joined the investigation. It is further submitted that petitioner is not required for custodial interrogation in

the present case.

4.) In view of these facts and circumstances, without expressing any opinion on the merits of case, the order dated 13.08.2018, granting interim bail to

the petitioner, is hereby made absolute. Petitioner shall remain bound by the conditions as envisaged in Section 438 (2) of Cr.P.C.

5.) The petitioner shall not in any way indulge in any criminal activities and he shall not influence the witnesses or otherwise interfere with the fair

trial.

6.) Petition stands allowed.