High CourtsSingle Bench

VINOD UPRETI ALIAS BANTI UPRETI vs STATE OF UTTARAKHAND

Uttarakhand High Court · Decided on 24 May 2018 · Citation: (2018) 05 UK CK 0113

HON’BLE JUDGES
SUDHANSHU DHULIA, J
ACTS & SECTIONS REFERRED
Indian Penal Code, 1860 — Section 307, 504, 506 · Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — Section 309
RESULT
Dismissed
CASE NUMBER
Original Jurisdiction 2nd Bail Application No. 13 of 2018 Order on bail application of the accused

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

12 paragraphs · 203 words

Sudhanshu Dhulia, J

1.

Miscellaneous application (IA No.3960 of 2018) is allowed. Counter affidavit filed on behalf of State is taken on record.

2.

The applicant before this Court is an accused in Case Crime/FIR No.0186 of 2017, which has been registered under Sections 307, 504 and 506 of

IPC, at Police Station Haldwani, District Nainital.

3.

This is the second bail application moved by the applicant before this Court. The first bail application of the applicant was rejected by this Court vide

order dated 25.10.2017 in BA 1st No.1547 of 2017.Â

4.

Considering the overall facts and circumstances of the case and the nature of offence, this Court is not inclined to enlarge the applicant on bail.

There is no new ground to enlarge the applicant on bail. Accordingly, the bail application is rejected.

5.

However, the trial court is hereby directed to expedite the trial as expeditiously as possible in letter and spirit of Section 309 CrPC without granting

any unnecessary adjournments to any of the parties.Â

6.

It is made clear that any observation made by this Court is only for the purposes of present bail application. It shall not be taken into consideration at

all in any other proceedings.